What is PESTLE analysis?

A PESTLE analysis (or PESTEL analysis, sometimes simplified to PEST analysis) is a strategic planning framework that has you examine six types of external factors that can impact an organization: Political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental factors.

PESTLE analysis gives you context for your strategic decision-making, which you can use to improve your strategic plans.

The primary objective of a PESTLE analysis

The primary objective of a PESTLE analysis is to reduce strategic uncertainty by systematically identifying external opportunities and risks that could materially affect your organization's direction, investments, and competitive position.

It surfaces the macro-environmental forces you cannot control but absolutely must understand before committing resources to a new initiative.

That definition matters because it clarifies what PESTLE actually delivers. You're not conducting this analysis to understand your internal capabilities or to benchmark against competitors directly.

Those are valuable exercises, but they belong to other frameworks. PESTLE sits upstream of those conversations. It answers a more fundamental question: what's happening in the world around us that could change the rules of the game?

When done well, a PESTLE analysis produces several concrete outputs that feed directly into strategic planning.

First, it generates a set of assumptions you'll need to validate before moving forward with major decisions.

Second, it identifies risks worth monitoring on an ongoing basis, complete with early warning indicators.

Third, it highlights opportunities that might otherwise remain invisible because they exist outside your immediate competitive field of vision.

And fourth, it provides the raw material for scenario planning, helping you stress-test strategies against plausible futures rather than a single optimistic forecast.

In practical terms, PESTLE informs decisions like whether to enter a new geographic market, how to price products in an inflationary environment, which regulatory shifts might affect your product roadmap, and where to locate supply chain operations. It's the contextual layer that makes those decisions more robust.

Without it, you're essentially planning in a vacuum, assuming the external environment will remain static. It rarely does.

PESTLE in practice: the end-to-end workflow (data → insights → decisions)

Understanding the six PESTLE factors is one thing. Actually running the analysis from start to finish is another. Here's a practical workflow that takes you from initial scoping through to strategic action, with clear outputs at each stage.

Step 1: Define your scope and strategic question.

Before gathering any data, clarify what decision this analysis will inform. Are you evaluating a market entry? Assessing risk for an existing product line? The scope determines which factors deserve the most attention.

Output: a one-paragraph scope statement and 2-3 specific questions you need answered.

Owner: Strategy lead.

Time: 1-2 hours.

Step 2: Identify your sources by factor.

For each PESTLE category, map out where you'll find reliable information. Political and legal factors often require government publications, regulatory filings, and policy analysis from think tanks. Economic data comes from central banks, industry associations, and financial news.

Social trends emerge from demographic reports, consumer research, and media analysis. Technological shifts surface in patent filings, industry publications, and analyst reports.

Environmental factors draw from sustainability reports, scientific publications, and regulatory guidance.

Output: a source matrix with 3-5 sources per factor.

Owner: Research analyst.

Time: 2-4 hours.

Step 3: Gather primary and secondary data.

Secondary research forms your foundation, but don't neglect internal subject matter experts. Your sales team knows what customers are saying about regulatory concerns. Your operations team understands supply chain vulnerabilities. Conduct brief interviews to supplement desk research.

Output: raw data organized by factor.

Owner: Research analyst with SME input.

Time: 1-2 weeks depending on scope.

Step 4: Analyze and rate each factor.

For every trend or force you've identified, assess two dimensions: likelihood of occurrence and potential impact on your business. A simple high-medium-low rating works, though some teams prefer numerical scales. The goal is prioritization, not precision.

Output: a rated factor list with brief rationale for each rating.

Owner: Cross-functional team.

Time: half-day workshop.

Step 5: Identify leading indicators.

For your highest-priority factors, determine what signals would tell you the situation is changing. If regulatory risk is high, what specific legislative actions would you monitor? If economic conditions matter, which metrics serve as early warnings?

Output: a monitoring dashboard with 2-3 indicators per priority factor.

Owner: CI or strategy team.

Time: 2-3 hours.

Step 6: Convert findings into strategic implications.

This is where analysis becomes actionable. Translate your prioritized factors into three categories: initiatives to pursue, assumptions to validate, and risks to mitigate. Each should connect directly to your original strategic question.

Output: a one-page implications summary.

Owner: Strategy lead.

Time: 2-4 hours.

Step 7: Integrate into planning and establish refresh cadence.

PESTLE isn't a one-time exercise. Determine how often you'll revisit the analysis, typically quarterly for fast-moving industries or annually for more stable environments. Assign ownership for ongoing monitoring.

Output: integration into strategic planning calendar.

Owner: Strategy lead.

Time: 1 hour.

You're done when you can answer three questions:

What external forces most affect our strategic options?

What would tell us those forces are shifting?

And what are we going to do about it?

The six components of PESTLE analysis

PESTLE at a glance: letters and the key question to ask

Before diving into the details of each factor, it helps to have a quick reference that captures what each letter represents and the core strategic question it addresses. Think of this as your mental checklist when scanning the external environment.

Letter

Factor

Key question

P

Political

What government actions or political shifts could change the rules of the game for our industry?

E

Economic

How might macroeconomic conditions affect our costs, pricing power, and customer demand?

S

Social

What demographic trends or cultural shifts could alter who buys from us and why?

T

Technological

Which emerging technologies could disrupt our operations, products, or competitive position?

L

Legal

What current or pending legislation could constrain or enable how we do business?

E

Environmental

How do physical environment factors and sustainability pressures affect our operations and market?

Each question serves as a starting point for deeper investigation. The political question, for instance, prompts you to consider not just current government policies but also the stability of those policies and the likelihood of change.

The economic question pushes beyond headline GDP figures to examine the specific economic forces that touch your business model.

Notice that these questions all share a common structure: they focus on external forces and their potential impact on your organization. They don't ask about your internal strengths or weaknesses. They don't compare you to competitors. They examine the broader environment in which all players operate.

Now let's unpack each factor in detail, exploring the specific considerations and examples that bring these questions to life in practice.

The six components

PESTLE analysis has you break down the external factors that impact your organization into six categories.

When performing the analysis, you’ll consider how the current state of each of these buckets might impact your business, its profitability, and its prospects in the short and long term.

Let’s examine each one in detail:

  1. Political factors.
  2. Economic factors.
  3. Social factors.
  4. Technological factors.
  5. Legal factors.
  6. Environmental factors.

Political factors

Political factors encompass everything from government policies to political unrest.

If one country’s government doesn’t see eye-to-eye with the government of another, this might affect your decisions on whether to do business internationally with suppliers located in that country.

As another example, the breakdown of relations between governments can lead to changes in international trade policy. These changes might make it harder for you to sell your products overseas.

The relative political stability of a country also matters. An organization looking to go multinational is unlikely to choose to set up a sister office in a country dogged by political unrest.

Consider:

  • Presence and strength of international trade agreements.
  • Governmental policy incentivizing or limiting business activity.
  • Political unrest vs. political stability.

When conducting a PESTLE analysis for organizations operating across the Atlantic, the political and legal factors require distinct treatment for each jurisdiction.

The governance structures, regulatory philosophies, and enforcement approaches differ substantially, and these differences shape the questions you need to ask.

Political context comparison:

Dimension

European Union

United States

Strategic implication

Governance structure

Multi-level: EU institutions set directives, member states implement with variation

Federal system with significant state-level autonomy

In the EU, monitor both Brussels and key member states; in the US, track federal and relevant state governments

Policy stability

Generally slower to change due to consensus requirements across 27 members

Can shift more rapidly with administration changes

EU policies tend to be more predictable once enacted; US policies may reverse with elections

Trade policy

Unified external trade policy through EU Commission

Federal trade policy with some state-level trade offices

Single point of contact for EU trade matters; more fragmented US landscape

Political risk profile

Lower risk of dramatic policy shifts; higher risk of regulatory complexity

Higher risk of policy reversals; simpler regulatory structure in some areas

Plan for regulatory compliance costs in EU; plan for policy scenario flexibility in US

Legal and regulatory comparison:

Dimension

European Union

United States

Strategic implication

Regulatory approach

Precautionary principle: prove safety before market entry

Generally permissive: regulate after problems emerge

EU market entry often requires more upfront compliance investment

Data protection

GDPR applies uniformly with substantial penalties

Patchwork of federal and state laws; CCPA in California, others emerging

EU requires comprehensive data compliance; US requires jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction assessment

Labor law

Strong worker protections, works councils, termination restrictions

At-will employment in most states, fewer federal protections

EU operations require different HR practices and cost structures

Antitrust enforcement

Aggressive enforcement, particularly on tech and market dominance

Historically less aggressive, though increasing scrutiny

EU more likely to challenge mergers and market practices

Product liability

Harmonized through EU directives

State-level variation, class action exposure

US litigation risk often higher; EU compliance requirements often stricter

Questions to ask your counsel and compliance team:

For EU operations, clarify which member states have additional requirements beyond EU directives, how enforcement varies across jurisdictions, and what the timeline looks like for upcoming regulatory changes.

For US operations, determine which state laws apply to your activities, how federal agency priorities might shift with political changes, and what litigation exposure exists in your sector.

The key insight here is that neither jurisdiction is simply more or less favorable. They present different risk profiles and require different compliance strategies. Your PESTLE analysis should capture these distinctions rather than treating political and legal factors as uniform across geographies.

Economic factors

PESTLE’s Economic category concerns everything to do with the economy of your own country, countries you do business with, and countries where a large percentage of your target market resides.

For example, fluctuating exchange rates should be of particular interest. If your organization is in the U.S., and you do frequent business with the United Kingdom, the strength or weakness of the GBP/USD exchange rate will impact your business decisions (and your bottom line.)

The economic policy of any country of interest, decided by their Central Bank, might also factor into your strategic plans. Interest rate hikes attract money from overseas, but also affect consumer attitudes toward spending.

Also, if labor is cheap in another country, or you can source crucial materials more affordably there, it might serve as a cost-effective base of operations for you. Planning to open up shop there could be a great strategic decision.

Here’s a short list of economic factors to consider:

  • Strength/weakness of relevant currencies.
  • Inflation and interest rates.
  • Labor costs.
  • Unemployment rates.
  • Economic growth vs. recession.

What is targeting in marketing?
Unlock marketing success with precision targeting! Dive into demographics, geography, behavior, and more. Tailor your strategy and connect with your audience like never before.


Social factors

The court of public opinion matters.

It decides what’s in or out of favor at that moment. If you’re caught up in controversy and the public’s judgment doesn’t fall in your favor, wider consumer attitudes towards your brand, your products, and, ultimately, your bottom line are bound to be affected.

You can take a more granular approach to the social factors of a PESTLE analysis by incorporating what you already know about your established market segments .

For example, factors like level of education, age, and disposable income can influence who you decide to market to most heavily. Or whether there are specific times of the month or year when certain market segments are most open to receiving your messaging and spending with you.

Other social factors to consider include:

  • Accepted norms vs. taboos.
  • Immigration and emigration, and what that means for your targetable demographics.
  • Levels of unemployment.
  • Social mobility and associated beliefs.

The Only Four Types of Market Segmentation You Need to Know
Of all the possible ways you can segment your market, there are four that have stood the test of time. When intelligently combined, these segmentation methods make for effective, insightful segments with high ROI and strong predictive power.


Technological factors

We all know it: Technology has the power to disrupt.

It can change entire industries, render entire job roles obsolete, and make the once-impossible possible.

New technologies can help you, or they can hurt you.

They can automate processes , making your entire operation more efficient. Or they can offer high-tech alternatives that leave your products and services obsolete in the eyes of the consumer.

So they should certainly factor into your strategic planning sessions.

But, since new technology is inherently unpredictable, it’s difficult to make accurate predictions.

So here’s how to approach this: Of all the infinite things that could happen, what finite selection of these things is most likely to happen?

In addition, what one or two other things, though unlikely, would be so catastrophic (or miraculous, when they constitute opportunities rather than threats) should they occur, that you’d be mad not to give them a place in your plan?

Deal with these things.

Here are some technological factors to consider in your PESTLE analysis:

  • Emergence of new technologies and how they might affect the ways you do business.
  • Technology that enables vs. technology that inhibits or challenges.
  • Software vs. hardware advancements.
  • Consumer technology devices and usage.

The legal factors in a PESTLE analysis are those that influence how you run your business and, as a result, your associated costs and profitability.

Legislative bodies can pass laws that, for example, make it harder for you to break into a new industry.

Your products might suddenly need to pass stringent tests before they can go to market, for instance. Creating models capable of passing those more stringent tests can be expensive.

Or, a new law could make it hard or impossible for you to market to a certain group of people who’ve so far made up the majority of your target demographic.

Here are some legal factors to consider during your analysis:

  • Laws that limit or enable competition and competitive diversity.
  • Health & safety legislation that might affect your responsibilities to your employees or customers.
  • Laws on compensation requirements (like the minimum wage).
  • Antitrust laws.
  • Data protection laws.
  • Advertising standards.
💡
Unlock expert templates, frameworks, and insider content from industry giants like Google and Amazon, right at your fingertips. Become an Insider member today.

Environmental factors

Finally, we come to the environmental factors.

Here’s an example: Solar panel manufacturers are much more likely to have success in sunny states like Nevada or California than in Washington. In fact, this manufacturer might deprioritize entire countries, like the infamously overcast U.K., in favor of sunnier locales.

The potential for natural disasters might also factor in. Areas that experience a lot of earthquakes might make up the entire target market for an organization that specializes in building earthquake-safe structures. But this org might not have a presence at all in countries that never experience earthquakes.

Other considerations, like waste management and emissions, as well as related taxation or incentives, should factor into your strategic plans.

Here’s a short list of other possible environmental factors to think about:

  • The potential for natural disasters in or near a place of business.
  • Prevalence and emergence of disease (possible and actual).
  • Sustainability responsibilities, such as recycling and waste management, or emissions targets and related taxation or incentives.
  • Concern for endangered species and all wildlife.

Common PESTLE mistakes (and how to avoid them)

Even experienced analysts stumble when conducting PESTLE analyses. The framework seems straightforward, but several common pitfalls can undermine its value. Here's what to watch for and how to course-correct.

Mistake 1: Listing without prioritizing.

Teams often generate exhaustive lists of factors without distinguishing between what matters and what's merely interesting.

Why it hurts: decision-makers get overwhelmed and the analysis fails to guide action.

What to do instead: rate every factor on impact and likelihood, then focus your strategic response on the top five to seven items.

It's easy to include factors that reflect personal beliefs rather than documented evidence.

Why it hurts: the analysis becomes unreliable and loses credibility with stakeholders.

What to do instead: require a source citation for every factor included, and distinguish clearly between established trends and emerging signals.

Mistake 3: Mixing internal issues into external analysis.

PESTLE examines the macro environment, not your organization's capabilities or competitive position.

Why it hurts: it muddles the framework's purpose and creates confusion when integrating with other tools like SWOT.

What to do instead: if something relates to your internal operations, move it to a separate analysis.

Mistake 4: Treating PESTLE as a one-time exercise.

The external environment shifts constantly. An analysis conducted eighteen months ago may no longer reflect current reality.

Why it hurts: strategic plans based on outdated assumptions lead to poor decisions.

What to do instead: establish a refresh cadence, quarterly for volatile industries or annually for stable ones, and assign clear ownership for monitoring.

Mistake 5: Failing to connect insights to decisions.

A beautifully formatted PESTLE document that sits in a shared drive unused is a waste of effort.

Why it hurts: the analysis consumes resources without delivering value.

What to do instead: end every PESTLE with explicit implications, stating what initiatives to pursue, what assumptions to validate, and what risks to mitigate.

Mistake 6: Ignoring factor interdependencies.

Political decisions affect economic conditions. Technological shifts create legal questions. Environmental pressures drive social attitudes.

Why it hurts: analyzing factors in isolation misses the compound effects that often matter most.

What to do instead: after completing individual factor analysis, spend time mapping connections between your highest-priority items.

Mistake 7: Assigning the wrong owner.

PESTLE requires cross-functional input, but someone needs to drive the process and maintain the document.

Why it hurts: without clear ownership, the analysis becomes fragmented or abandoned.

What to do instead: designate a single owner, typically in strategy or competitive intelligence, with explicit responsibility for coordination and updates.

Mistake 8: Scope creep.

Trying to analyze every possible market, region, or scenario in a single PESTLE creates an unwieldy document that serves no one well.

Why it hurts: the analysis becomes too broad to be actionable.

What to do instead: define a clear scope upfront and create separate analyses for distinct strategic questions.

Quality bar checklist: Before finalizing your PESTLE, confirm that every factor has a source, ratings reflect team consensus rather than individual opinion, the top priorities connect to specific strategic actions, and an owner is assigned for ongoing monitoring.

How long should a PESTLE take?

For a focused scope, expect two to three weeks from kickoff to final document, including data gathering, team workshops, and write-up. Rushing the process typically produces superficial analysis, while extending it indefinitely suggests scope creep or unclear objectives.

PESTLE analysis: advantages and disadvantages

We’ve covered a lot so far already. Before we get stuck into how to actually perform one, it’s worth briefly going over some of PESTLE analysis’ core strengths and weaknesses. 

This will help you decide when it’s appropriate to use it,

What are the advantages of PESTLE analysis?

  • Goes in-depth on external macro factors that can play into longer-term industry trends.
  • Provides context on your strategic business decisions.
  • Helps you identify both threats and opportunities in your competitive landscape.
  • Fits neatly into other frameworks, like SWOT analysis , for examination of external factors.

What are the disadvantages of PESTLE analysis?

  • Only deals with external factors.
    • Combine with other frameworks, like SWOT analysis, for best results.
  • Difficult to perform. How do you foresee all the possible factors? What if you miss something?
  • Won’t help you identify existing blind spots, which can render your analysis less effective.

5 SWOT Analysis Benefits (and 4 Limitations)
The SWOT analysis framework has its benefits, but it also has its fair share of detractors and limitations. Here they are according to our experts.


How to do a PESTLE analysis

Okay, so we’re familiar with each of PESTLE’s buckets, and what might factor into each one.

What does the process for performing a PESTLE analysis actually look like?

The good news is, the process for performing PESTLE analysis is much the same as for performing any kind of competitive analysis or for facilitating strategic planning .

Here’s the seven-step process:

  1. Establish goals and objectives.
  2. Prepare.
  3. Collect data.
  4. Analyze collected data.
  5. Create a response plan.
  6. Operationalize and action your strategic plan.
  7. Monitor and adjust.

1) Establish goals and objectives

As with any analysis, your first step is to get crystal clear on what it is you want to accomplish.

Are you trying to establish a competitive advantage? If so, you’ll be interested in the opportunities and threats your competitive environment has to offer. PESTLE analysis can clarify where these lie, and how to exploit them.

Are you trying to get a handle on where the market might be headed? Brainstorming through the six components of PESTLE analysis can help you get ahead of industry trends and anticipate key market events.

Getting clear on your primary objectives as your first step will inform the rest of your analysis, so don’t skip this part.

2) Prepare

Next up, it’s time to prepare.

Any analysis like this is time-consuming. While you can perform PESTLE analysis in microcosm – brainstorming on your own – you’ll get the best results if you involve people or teams from across the business, even if only in a small way.

And if you’re involving a lot of other people, you’ll need to be respectful of their time, which means figuring out an efficient way to canvass them all and get their input.

Interviews, surveys, and even a general call out on Slack or Teams for input can work.

At this point, you’ll want to take care of tasks like:

  • Gauging interest and availability for interviews or meetings.
  • Booking out meeting rooms.
  • Sending out calendar invites.
  • Deciding on questions and creating survey forms.
  • Sending necessary messages.
  • Creating and assigning other miscellaneous tasks.
💡
It pays to have brainstormed through the PESTLE analysis on your own first. This way, you’ll have more to offer, and will feel more at ease leading any sessions.

3) Collect data

Now it’s time to collect the data.

If you’ve got time, collecting case studies is a hugely useful exercise.

Records of specific events in the recent past, and how they affected your org (or another organization you or someone else used to work at) make for great learning opportunities and will help you forecast future events.

By this point, everything should be set up, so all that’s left for you to do is ask your questions, hold your meetings, and collect the necessary data.

4) Analyze your data

With your data collected, it’s time for the actual analysis to begin. The goal here is first to process all of your information, and then to tease out meaningful conclusions. You’re looking to answer this question:

What do your findings mean for your business?

Chances are, much of the data you collect will be text-based… but – wait!

You don’t have to do all the data processing yourself. Remember, just as technology can disrupt, it can also enable. Generative AI is the perfect tool here for helping you whip through text data, structured data, and even numeric data at super speeds.

Here’s an example workflow:

  1. Have an automated transcription tool note down everything said in all your meetings.
  2. Offload it to your chat-based AI of choice for aggregation, deduplication, and summarization.
  3. Your AI tool already knows what PESTLE analysis is, so ask it to run one on the information you’ve given it.

Your AI’s conclusions can serve as the basis of your own analysis, or as a handy second opinion, depending on how much you trust AI tools.

WARNING: Read your AI tool’s small print. If you’ve got any proprietary data related to your business, be careful before you feed it in. The Ts and Cs for many of these tools say any information you provide gets fed straight into the large language model (LLM) as training data.

That means the AI, accessible by billions of people, knows and can share proprietary information about your business.

Note: The solution is to run your own AI agent. You can use AutoGPT, or some other GPT-4-based offshoot of ChatGPT for this. Other mainstream chat-based AI tools do promise to keep the data you feed them private. Trust them if you wish.

Whether you use AI, a human assistant, or your own brainpower to digest all that intel, you end this step when you’ve pored over everything, and drawn meaningful conclusions about what it all means for your org.

5) Create a response plan

Now that you know what your findings mean for your business, you can figure out what to do about them.

While the data gathering and data analysis parts of the process are time intensive, it’s perhaps this step that’s most important.

Your response plan should be based on your conclusions about what the data you’ve uncovered means for your business. And, of course, this should be informed by, and aligned with, the key objective for the analysis you outlined right at the start.

For any decisive conclusions you’ve reached (like opportunities, or looming threats you need to address), figure out what needs to be done and break this down into a series of actionable steps.

These action points form the basis of the next stage…

6) Operationalize and action your strategic plan

So you know what needs doing.

All that’s left is to translate your steps into your project management software.

This way, everything gets tracked. Every task has its details and an assigned owner. Build project boards where necessary with dependencies between tasks, so there’s visibility into any issues or blockers.

For more on this, check out: How to operationalize a strategic plan.

7) Monitor and adjust

No plan can be perfect.

So build flexibility into the plan as a core feature from the start.

Don’t make your plan, its due dates, its action steps so rigid the whole thing falls apart if a prediction doesn’t come to pass, or a primary deadline gets missed.

Monitor the progress and effectiveness of your strategic plan as time passes. Accept it, with all its imperfections, and make the necessary adjustments to maximize your competitive advantage and exploit every possible market opportunity.

PESTLE vs. Porter's Five Forces: Which should you use (and when)?

Here's the thing that trips up a lot of analysts: PESTLE and Porter's Five Forces both examine external factors, but they're answering fundamentally different questions.

PESTLE scans the macro environment – the broad political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental forces that shape entire markets.

Porter's Five Forces, on the other hand, zooms in on industry structure and competitive dynamics – supplier power, buyer power, competitive rivalry, threat of substitutes, and barriers to entry.

One tells you about the weather; the other tells you who else is in the race.

How to Run a Porter’s Five Forces Analysis Session
Running a business analysis using Porter’s Five Forces (P5F) is an exciting opportunity to dig deeper into your customers’ motivations and behaviors. It’s a great way to gain new insights into your business, and it’s often used in strategic planning.

So when do you reach for each tool? Use PESTLE when you're evaluating market entry timing, geographic expansion, or regulatory shifts that could reshape demand before you even compete. It's your early-warning system for macro disruption.

Use Porter's Five Forces when you need to understand competitive intensity, pricing power, and margin structure within a specific industry. It helps you answer questions like: Can we actually make money here? How defensible is our position?

Here's a quick decision guide:

Question you're answering

Use PESTLE

Use Five Forces

Will new regulations affect market viability?


How intense is rivalry among existing players?


Are demographic shifts creating new demand?


Do suppliers have leverage over pricing?


Could economic downturns shrink the market?


Are there high barriers protecting incumbents?


In practice, the most robust analysis uses both sequentially. Start with PESTLE to understand whether the macro environment is favorable, then apply Five Forces to assess whether you can compete profitably within that environment.

From there, feed your findings into SWOT to translate external insights into strategic options.

The sequence (PESTLE → Five Forces → SWOT) gives you a complete picture: macro context, industry dynamics, and your organization's position relative to both.


TL;DR

Phew. 😮‍💨

We’ve covered a lot… let’s sum up!

🌍 PESTLE analysis sees you examine six external macro factors (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental) that affect your organization.

The framework helps provide context for your strategic planning and business decision-making.

💰 For economic factors, keep an eye on exchange rates, inflation, interest rates, labor costs, and economic policies. They can directly influence your bottom line.

🧲 Remember that new technology can help, or it can hurt. Ask yourself whether any emerging technologies could automate your processes, or otherwise save you costs.

💼 When performing a PESTLE analysis, begin with the end in mind. Figure out where you want to get to before you start, and consider employing an AI tool to help you digest all that data.


Give yourself an unfair advantage

Our newest competitive intelligence course lifts the lid on the frameworks and processes experts use to deliver impactful intel with confidence.

You can expect:

  • A 100% self-paced and online course packed with competitive wisdom so you can stop worrying and start winning.
  • Bonus features from established competitive professionals to give you an unfair advantage.
  • 6 downloadable, customizable templates and frameworks that make analysis a cinch.

Competitive Intelligence: Core


We'll show you how to:

  • 👑 Lead development of your org’s all-important competitive positioning.
  • 🦾 Master CI’s essentials, including its most powerful research techniques.
  • 🚀 Arm sales and customer success with intel to skyrocket win rates and turn down churn.
  • 🧠 Offer leaders critical intel that informs their decision-making and strategy.
  • 📈 Elevate CI’s role within your org to ensure career progression.
Learn more